4 cyl vs 6 cyl - Subaru Outback - Subaru Outback Forums
Closed Thread
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
post #1 of 394 (permalink) Old 04-12-2012, 11:26 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
4 cyl vs 6 cyl

I'm buying a 2012 Limited Outback this weekend. That's the good news - one decision made. I currently drive a 2007 Toyota Highlander. I love the get up and go of the 6 cyl but I'd like to get better mileage as I drive an hour each way to work. But is it worth it? I'm test driving tonight and I know that from a brief test drive, it's going to be hard to decide whether the OB's 4cyl in the long run is going to be a very large difference from it's 6 cyl, so I thought I'd ask for opinions.

Thanks so much. (& thanks for the help in learning how to post to forums!)

Chiefjones is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 394 (permalink) Old 04-12-2012, 11:31 AM
Registered User
Fiala06's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Eugene, OR
Car: 2012 Outback Premium
Posts: 110
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Woooo you created your first topic! Welcome to the world of forums! :P

I'm not going to be to helpful on this topic but I purchased the 4cyl due to the better gas millage, but seeing as I always have stuff on my roof rack its a lot lower then what its suppose to get but that's given.

Fiala06 is offline  
post #3 of 394 (permalink) Old 04-12-2012, 11:33 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 31
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Calculate the cost difference in gas and vehicle. Make a financial decision if you don't want to make the bigger engine more fun decision.

I have the four cylinder but really wanted the manual transmission. I have plenty of power but live in flat Iowa.

So far I've turned 90,000 miles over on my 2010 and plan on putting another 90,000 on before getting a new vehicle. No major issues so far, which was my concern with the smaller engine.
Wwwweeeeeeee is offline  
post #4 of 394 (permalink) Old 04-12-2012, 11:38 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Car: 2012 OUTBACK 2.5 LIMITED SILVER ICE Metallic, moon and nav free
Posts: 1,220
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Tons of threads on this already. If you don't care about the extra cost and some MPG penalty get the H6. If you want to spend less all the way around, get the 4. The CVT makes the 4 more than usuable. But many here seem to think they are buying a sports sedan and prefer more power. Regardless, keep in mind this car is a WAGON. If you want fast and sporty get the STI.

HIS: 2015 Forester XT Premium ISM
HERS: 2015 Forester XT Premium SWP
dboz is offline  
post #5 of 394 (permalink) Old 04-12-2012, 11:44 AM
SubaruOutback.org Founder
Kevin's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Indianapolis
Car: MY10 Outback CVT
Posts: 3,740
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Hello Chief, welcome to Outback.org!

If there is one topic that has been beaten to death on this site it is this discussion, not your fault but there have been multiple "2.5 vs 3.6" or "4 cylinder vs. 6 cylinder" threads over the past few years.

Here is a link to a post I made in our other most recent thread along these lines, in it contains links to previous thread.

Hope this helps: http://www.subaruoutback.org/forums/...tml#post408591
Kevin is online now  
post #6 of 394 (permalink) Old 04-12-2012, 12:17 PM
Registered User
iainb's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Gainesville, VA
Car: '15 STi and '13 GTI
Posts: 1,009
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
<- New 4 cylinder owner. I'm sure the 3.6 is great, but we bought the 2.5i for the better fuel economy since I mainly commute in it. I'm perfectly happy with the power the car has. If I want to drive a "quick" car I'll hop in our turbo Jetta.

My parents have a loaded 2011 Highlander with the V6 and while it does have a lot of get-up-and-go the gas mileage in it is atrocious. Also, I'm not a fan of how sensitive the gas pedal is- the slightest touch of the gas and that Highlander is off, it's way to sensitive.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
iainb is offline  
post #7 of 394 (permalink) Old 04-12-2012, 12:31 PM
Registered User
sbpark's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: East Bay Area, CA
Car: 2017 Outback 2.5i Limited, EyeSight & Nav.
Posts: 546
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
I am on my second Subaru, and went from an '06 Forester 2.5x to a '12 OB Premium 2.5 CVT. I was in the same boat as you, and will admit that I still may have a touch of buyers remorse at times for NOT getting the 3.6, however the 2.5 is more than capable. The ONLY time I wish I had more power would be merging on freeways here in southern California. Other than that I have no complaints at all with the 2.5. I'm already taking a hit on mileage with the AWD, and the 6cyl makes it even worse.

I have not towed anything with the new OB, but used to tow a Triumph Thruxton (a 640lbs cafe racer) in a U-Haul motorcycle trailer back and forth to Los Angeles and the one thing I was impressed about with the Forester was that it had plenty or torque and didn't even blink when towing the bike and trailer (but again, i was not winning any races, and it's not the same as towing with a full size truck obviously). It might be a small engine, and not the fastest thing out there, but for what it was it did have some grunt! Now if you are going to be towing something bigger, or towing frequently though, i'd think its a no brainer and get the 3.6. If you are just getting something as an 'all-around', have a bit of a longer commute to and from work (my commute is 70 miles roundtrip 3 days a week) and want decent mileage, SLIGHTLY lower maintenance costs, and save a few bucks at the dealership, the 2.5 is more than adequate. It really all depends on your priorities and what you want out of it. Like others have mentioned, if you want a fast car, you won't find that with either engine, and get a WRX.

I can say with confidence that although my '06 was only nearing 100k miles, which is not a lot for a Subaru, I beat the **** out of that car. I took care of it mechanically, but used it for what it was intended for. IT was cross country several times, FULLY loaded with stuff on the roof as well, been to the desert in ridiculous heat, mud, sand, hail, snow, rain, and plenty of trailheads out in Colorado that require 4WD/AWD (never any rock crawling or really gnarly off road stuff, obviously), and it also made a great surf car for the last three years here in San Diego as I could fit a 9'6 longboard INSIDE the Forester, and NEVER had an issue. So as far as durability and longevity of the 4cyl/2.5, I wouldn't worry. I will say though that if I still have the '12 OB the car after the 3 year/36k bumper to bumper warranty expires, I may consider getting an extended warranty, simply for all the electrical stuff on the car. I'm more worried about having to pay out the ar$e for tracking down some electrical gremlin if my sunroof breaks, heated seats malfunction, etc. This is not just particular to Subaru, but any car that has all the modern luxuries that can break. The drivetrain though is solid in either the 4cyl or 6cyl.
sbpark is offline  
post #8 of 394 (permalink) Old 04-12-2012, 12:43 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Northern NJ
Car: '12 6MT Premium OB, AWP, Moonroof
Posts: 27
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
2.5i only if you want 6MT.

If not, 3.6 all the way!

nlui220 is offline  
post #9 of 394 (permalink) Old 04-12-2012, 12:58 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: In, Out & Around.
Posts: 156
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
3.6, all are underpowered for this vehicle but that one is paired the best out of all the options available.
IC0N0CLAST is offline  
post #10 of 394 (permalink) Old 04-12-2012, 01:46 PM
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 121
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Both are WEAK. Getting a 3.6 for the small increase in "performance" while getting a large decrease in gas mileage didn't make sense to me. If I wanted the 3.6's gas mileage I woudl have gotten a real SUV.

greenerob441 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Closed Thread

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Subaru Outback - Subaru Outback Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome