![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#1252 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Florida Panhandle
Car: 2013 Outback, E93 and E36 BMWs
Posts: 438
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
3000 miles now a lot of city driving mostly 75% and temps cooler too. Mileage is between 23.5-24.9 which is still acceptable for the 3.6L but down from 24.5-25.0.
When measuring the mileage on the interstate doing 70 with the cruise on and AC seeing 26.7 most of the time. My hand calculations and the computed mileage agree well... |
|
|
|
|
|
#1253 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 61
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
I'm curious if this is pushing the limits of the drivetrain at higher speeds, or if this is simply the programming of the transmission. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1254 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Kansas City area
Car: 2013 Outback 2.5 Ltd
Posts: 7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
I'm generally in the same ballpark with my 2.5 cvt. Getting over 30mpg requires driving under 70mph.
Could be aerodynamics too. My 3.5l v6 minivan has a Cd of .32 while the Outback is .38. Both turn ~2000 rpms at 70mph, though the difference in highway mpg is not nearly as much as you might expect given the 23 vs 30mpg EPA estimates and 40% larger displacement of the v6 and more weight. The v6 doesn't have to work as hard-throttle opening, compared to the OB's 2.5. Pretty well-known that wind resistance rises exponentially with speed and the OB's relatively high drag figure due to higher ground clearance, etc. is increasingly a liability as speeds rise relative to other types of vehicles and how the EPA test results are generated. The gap in favor of the OB with highway mpg compared to my minivan diminishes as speeds increase over 70mph. I imagine there may even be a cross-over point at some speed I am unlikely to drive where the minivan may actually do better--80? 85? FYI I have seen 30mpg twice in the minivan at 70mph, once with substantial tailwind and once with a 4000 ft elevation drop over a 250 mile stretch. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1255 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Our 2013 limited 4 cyl never saw 30mpg. We got 26-27 on the first couple of tanks and now with 3700 miles, the milage has declined to the 24 mpg level. Most of the driving is mixed 70/30 highway/ city, and I fully expected the MPG to improve over time, not degrade.
Checking the Fuelly site, a lot of folks are getting similar experiences, with mileage getting worse after a couple of tanks. The 2013 does not even have the same average as the 2012/11, contrary to the Subaru claim of 24/30, a bit of false advertising? |
|
|
|
|
|
#1256 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Washington
Car: 2004 Toyota Sienna, miss my eyesight. Life moves on.
Posts: 982
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
I don't really think false advertising is at play as the EPA does those tests. I have a feeling that if I reset my trip odomenter everytime the engine was warm I'd get the advertised numbers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1257 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Orange County, CA
Car: 2012 OB 2.5i Premium
Posts: 105
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
I am getting 29/31 Highway often. I just made a trip to Las Vegas from Orange County. Got there in less than half a tank. Could almost make it back home. Love my OB.
__________________
Jordan May http://www.agentlemansword.com 2012 Subaru Outback 2.5i Premium - Silver |
|
|
|
|
|
#1258 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
I'm a bit disappointed right now with the fuel economy, though my 2013 2.5i CVT just crossed 1000 miles.
I've noticed the avg. mpg computer is off in combined cycle driving. First tank display was 23.5, actual was 23.4, second was 24.8 display, 28 actual. But on a long highway trip at speeds < 70mph I only averaged 25.4 - display and actual matched exact. When looking at cars, I drove a 2011 2.5i manual with 25k miles. That used car averaged 33.4 (at least on the display) on the same route as the cvt version which I bought seems to only get 25 - 28 mpg. I put 120 miles on the test car... I'm hoping my car improves over time... I bought the CVT as the fuel economy was rated higher than the manual. Experience so far says I can seem to get more mpg by shifting myself... I hope this changes. The CVT works so well, I would hope it can beat me selecting the gears! |
|
|
|
|
|
#1259 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 61
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
The Truth About EPA City / Highway MPG Estimates - Feature - Car and Driver We bought our 2013 2.5 cvt because we have for several years gotten Outbacks as loaners from the Porsche dealer, and the loaners got us 28-29 in suburban kind of driving (the same thing that gets us about 24 now). I think that the changes that Subaru made in 2013 to improve the mileage actually reduced mileage rather than increased it. That would seem to support what we see on Fuelly. Since at least some of the changes were software changes to the cvt, it would be nice if Subaru would do a TSR to try to improve mileage on the 2013. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1260 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: WA
Car: '12 Outback 2.5L CVT Premium, Skyblue
Posts: 1,027
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
I very consistently get 27 mpg on my trip to work which is all hwy but several stop lights. I can easily break 30 on the freeway.
Tips: Air up your tires 2-3 psi higher than the door. Drive 60 or below on the freeway. Make sure the CVT "knows" you are cruising. My mpg dropped to 25.5 on my current tank because I wanted to see if other's here were true. You need to let off the gas when you get to cruising speed or the CVT will never hit 6th gear. Watch the RPM meter. If you accel to speed and then hold it there at 60 you will see 2500+. Let off the gas and then reapply gently and you will see the rpm's go under 2k and stay there unless you go up a hill. As stupid as it sounds, you have to learn how to drive the CVT. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|