Thinnest fenders on earth? - Page 2 - Subaru Outback - Subaru Outback Forums

SubaruOutback.org is the premier Subaru Outback Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 11-21-2012, 10:03 AM   #11 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Buffalo NY
Car: 2008 Outback 2.5i AT
Posts: 112
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

I have not had any similar issues with my obw however it does have its share of small dings.

A long time ago I used to drive a Mitsu Eclipse GSX ('95) and the fenders on that were tissue thin. One of many things I hated about that car.
barkeater is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 11-21-2012, 10:54 AM   #12 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Reno, NV (Ca transplant)
Posts: 1,651
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

Thin gauge steel equals better MPG.
__________________
'12 Outback Limited 2.5i, Cypress Green Pearl, sunroof, illumination package #2, rear bumper guard, puddle lights, mudflaps, no nav
'10 Nissan Frontier SE Crew Cab 4X2 long bed
'98 BMW R1100RT-P
'86 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS, restored, original, stock
daily driver, '09 Harley Davidson FLHP
upflying is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2012, 02:21 PM   #13 (permalink)
Registered User
 
combatmedic870's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Portland, Oregon
Car: Black 2010 OB 2.5i Premium CVT
Posts: 1,411
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cobalt View Post
Wait til you lean on the roof, I think the headliner is actually holding it up
yep...i made that mistake....
__________________
,Ryan
Upgrades:
Primitive light bar and skid plates, Yakima Mega warrior, 18mm RSB , RA mud flaps, Front windows tinted 35% , Subaru bug shield/hood protector, SS damlifier pro , Full LED interior , Phillips HID low beams , Kenwood Exelon DNX-6960 Nav unit, Alpine Type R 17s in front and 17c in back , Kicker 360.4 WANTED: Full interior SS luxury liner pro, Amp and sub, Body side molding.
Rolling on Nokian WRG2XL
combatmedic870 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2012, 02:27 PM   #14 (permalink)
Registered User
 
combatmedic870's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Portland, Oregon
Car: Black 2010 OB 2.5i Premium CVT
Posts: 1,411
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wutbürger View Post
Wrong- go find a new Golf or GTI and try to find a soft spot..you wont- trust me as a former owner of one. Things are so incredibly solid, but there is a weight penalty to be had.

I remember the first time I saw my hood flexing in the wind at highway speeds in the OB, but I guess that's my price for a 30mpg AWD wagon
I have a 2012 GTI MT and its very solid....I havent found the weight penalty. I avg. 36mpg in it.

But my GTI's AWD sucks

BUT they do make a type r with AWD.
__________________
,Ryan
Upgrades:
Primitive light bar and skid plates, Yakima Mega warrior, 18mm RSB , RA mud flaps, Front windows tinted 35% , Subaru bug shield/hood protector, SS damlifier pro , Full LED interior , Phillips HID low beams , Kenwood Exelon DNX-6960 Nav unit, Alpine Type R 17s in front and 17c in back , Kicker 360.4 WANTED: Full interior SS luxury liner pro, Amp and sub, Body side molding.
Rolling on Nokian WRG2XL
combatmedic870 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2012, 10:17 PM   #15 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 58
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

After reading this, I spent my afternoon washing my cars. Pressed on the slab sides of my 2013 Outback, and it flexes like a beer can. Thinking this was thin metal/light weight/better mpg I walked across my driveway an checked my 2012 Prius. Some give, but much less and a thicker skin. Think 25% of the flex of the Outback. I suppose this is not about mpg. Then I went in the garage and pressed on my 2001 Porsche 911. No flex, stiff as a board. And far and away it's the lightest, yet most expensive of the lot.

I don't think this is about weight and mpg. This is about cost. Although my limited stickered above 30, and the SAPs well above that, this is really a $20K car. And to get it there, they had to compromise on materials and manufacturing process to sell a base model for that low. Which is why there was schmutz on the wheels to begin with.
Restlessk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2012, 10:23 PM   #16 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Reno, NV (Ca transplant)
Posts: 1,651
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

What was behind the panels during your stiffness test?
Panel shape also affect stiffness.
__________________
'12 Outback Limited 2.5i, Cypress Green Pearl, sunroof, illumination package #2, rear bumper guard, puddle lights, mudflaps, no nav
'10 Nissan Frontier SE Crew Cab 4X2 long bed
'98 BMW R1100RT-P
'86 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS, restored, original, stock
daily driver, '09 Harley Davidson FLHP
upflying is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2012, 12:19 AM   #17 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Portland, OR
Car: 2013 OB 3.6R SAP
Posts: 186
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

Well, at safecar.gov, the OB gets 4 out of 5 stars across the board, while a VW Passat, for example, gets 5 stars. Even the Prius beats the OB in the side collision test.

I do think the thin metal is an attempt at weight savings. Sometimes it's more expensive to make something lighter than not. Of course, we don't have access to the engineering details so we'll never know.

I do think 4 stars is pretty good, when you consider the MPG ratings & vehicle size combo we get with this car.

But yes, if you want the best safety, you probably should go European (Volvo, Audi, VW).
Georgeh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2012, 01:21 AM   #18 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 76
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

But the of course then, VW, Audi, Volvo, Mercedes Benz, BMW, and of course Porsche are actually cars that are generally undependable (people do have exceptions, but generally low reliability ratings), overpriced (except perhaps VW), full of unnecessary bells and whistles and cost a fortune to own and repair. Actually, the thinner the metal, the better it is for the planet. Generally, lightness in design is useful up to a point, (think laptops, airplanes, carbon-fiber, bicycles, etc.

Off-road you find very few if any of the European cars, generally Asian and American, unless someone wants to take their MB up trail which happens once in awhile. So press on the side of your Porsche as much as you want, even if you have to drop the exhaust to change the oil, but don't drive it off-road.
monty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2012, 09:43 AM   #19 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Nickshu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: NoCO
Car: '13 Outback 3.6R SAP
Posts: 866
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by monty View Post
But the of course then, VW, Audi, Volvo, Mercedes Benz, BMW, and of course Porsche are actually cars that are generally undependable (people do have exceptions, but generally low reliability ratings), overpriced (except perhaps VW), full of unnecessary bells and whistles and cost a fortune to own and repair. Actually, the thinner the metal, the better it is for the planet. Generally, lightness in design is useful up to a point, (think laptops, airplanes, carbon-fiber, bicycles, etc.

Off-road you find very few if any of the European cars, generally Asian and American, unless someone wants to take their MB up trail which happens once in awhile. So press on the side of your Porsche as much as you want, even if you have to drop the exhaust to change the oil, but don't drive it off-road.
Very true. I owned MANY european cars before my Subaru. They were mostly OK with reliability, but once you hit 60-80K miles the gremlins showed up and the nickel and dimeing started. They were much nicer and more refined that my Outback, but not by much. I do miss some bells and whistles, but having the Outback keeps more money in my wallet to spend on my old Porsche (fun/track) car.
__________________
Nick
_________
2013 Outback 3.6R Limited SAP -- Crystal Black Silica -- Aha SatNav, Remote Start, Tanabe Strut Bar, 19mm RSB, Weathertech Mats, Rear Seatback Protector, Rear Bumper Underguard, STI Exhaust Tips, 3M Clear Bra, Puddle Lights, Hella Supertone Horns
Future additions: Interior Illumination Kit, LED's, Yellow DRL's and Fogs
Gone: 2012 Outback 3.6R Limited

2009 Ford Flex SEL w/ towing package - PSV (Porsche Support Vehicle)
1982 Porsche 911SC - Track days and Sundays
Nickshu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2012, 10:40 AM   #20 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Reno, NV (Ca transplant)
Posts: 1,651
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

Excellent crash safety depends on the crushability of the vehicle. Easily deformed structures absorb energy in the collision to save the occupants. Stiff vehicles are actually more dangerous. It's all in the physics. Extend the Delta-V and you live.
__________________
'12 Outback Limited 2.5i, Cypress Green Pearl, sunroof, illumination package #2, rear bumper guard, puddle lights, mudflaps, no nav
'10 Nissan Frontier SE Crew Cab 4X2 long bed
'98 BMW R1100RT-P
'86 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS, restored, original, stock
daily driver, '09 Harley Davidson FLHP
upflying is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:21 AM.



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright 2009-2010 SubaruOutback.org. All Rights Reserved.