![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2011
Car: 2002 Outback Wagon 2.5L Auto Weather Package
Posts: 1,108
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
|
For your intake ideas, look at this thread:
'02 Outback wagon intake mod A 'CAI' that just puts a pod on the end of a pretty looking pipe in your engine bay isn't 'cold air' at all.
__________________
My car warms the rear window, mirrors, wipers, my butt, and my heart - because I WILL get there! |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Displaced to Chicago.
Car: 2003 2.5 4EAT with AWP.
Posts: 6,085
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Chips don't work.
The factory intake is a CAI, not much to be gained there. The above mentioned thread makes a bit more "growl" but the vehicle is already getting more air that it needs in stock form. The rotors from a 2002-04 Outback are slightly larger and could be a simple upgrade.
__________________
2003 Outback: "Kaylee". 125,000 and counting. Mods: GE Nighthawk low beams, HIR1 9011 high beam upgrade, Nokya 25k yellow fog lights, Fumoto valve, 04 Forester XT shift knob. Basics: G-Oil Bio-based Advanced Full Synthetic 5w30, Purolater oil filter, STP air filter, Valvoline Maxlife Dex/Merc ATF, Valvoline Durablend 80w90, Michelin Primacy MXV4. Also: More rust and parking lot scars than I care to think about. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: behind the Krell Metal door
Car: 03 H6 OBW & 06 WRX Sportwagon
Posts: 4,410
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
good opportunity to flush the fluid, replace the old brake hoses, refresh the parking brake shoes too.
__________________
Time Flies Like an Arrow, Fruit Flies Like a Banana! |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: moved to Nebraska..
Car: 2000 OB, MT
Posts: 31
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Would I just replace the rotors and get the same brake pads (if I need new pads)?
So, I'm still misunderstanding the intake situation, the stock one is fine/good enough? It isn't worth anything hp/efficiency wise? What about swaybars, any recomendations? Id probablywant my car lowered a litttle, and great suspension before that, wouldn't I? Or around the same timing? I want ti upgrade those around the summer time... I'm used to my old adjustable Eibachs, these ones feel so bouncy. Lol (but they're how they should be)-aok --thanks for the tips on saving me $$$ from the chip idea. And for the reference to have my car tuned --some day when I have an garage, ill take the tar out <P for weight..
__________________
Praise Yah! He is good. 2000 Wagon, stock, manual, needs some touch-ups |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: behind the Krell Metal door
Car: 03 H6 OBW & 06 WRX Sportwagon
Posts: 4,410
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
some people have swapped in legacy springs and struts. A heavier rear sway bay could be done now and 'likely' would still bolt in after a suspensions swap. Just getting some new KYB struts would probably be a huge improvement though.
you can search here for just about any system/component of your car and fine good info. pretty sure a brake swap will mean getting the caliper brackets/larger rotors/calipers/ and, from then on, pads for an 03 w'ever. basically, your brakes will be the same as a later model. there's a 'slight' possibility you will need bigger rims to clear the calipers but, someone with more experience can comment on that.
__________________
Time Flies Like an Arrow, Fruit Flies Like a Banana! |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Bronx NYC / Westchester
Car: DIY-Turbo 2.2l OBS 13.16s 1/4mile @ 104.70MPH
Posts: 328
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Bronx NYC / Westchester
Car: DIY-Turbo 2.2l OBS 13.16s 1/4mile @ 104.70MPH
Posts: 328
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2011
Car: 2002 Outback Wagon 2.5L Auto Weather Package
Posts: 1,108
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
|
Any gains in power and efficiency are fairly negligible. The only significant difference I've seen is on long duration loads - like going over a steep grade. Its certainly not about getting a noticeable increase in launch power or initial acceleration, but it does sound nice and aggressive when you get on it. The stock air feed from the front does as much 'cold air' as you'll need. The switch to a fender based feed of air might have a few benefits depending on the conditions you'll be driving in, but for most people its not a big deal. The mod is mostly a nice cheap, fun one to do. I like my car to 'talk' to me, so that's why I did mine. (Next will be exhaust, to let it 'talk' a little more.)
__________________
My car warms the rear window, mirrors, wipers, my butt, and my heart - because I WILL get there! |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 56
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
$140 on Ebay...and worth 10 hp in the mid range with no other changes. 10 hp is a 20% improvement right where you really need it!
This is because the stock y-pipe is a really poor design. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|