![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
Hi,
I am new to the forum. I just got a 2002 outback 5 speed last week. I am thinking of getting a set of snow and mud tires for the wagon. Can you guys tell me want size should I go with as I would like to get a narrower tire....215/65R16? or should I get some steel 15" rims and put some 215/75R15. If I go with the 15" rims would that clear the brakes. Your expert reply would be greatly appreaciate. Jim |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: PA
Car: 2006 Outback XT Limited
Posts: 2,453
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
A 205/65R16 would be a closer match to stock circumference while going a bit narrower.
205/70R15 is probably the right fit if you want to go to 15". Most 15" tires are a good bit cheaper than larger sizes, maybe enough to pay for the steelies too. 15" steel will clear stock brakes. Use a tire size calculator to verify that you are staying close to the stock circumference, if you haven't already. This will let you compare different tires. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Displaced to Chicago.
Car: 2003 2.5 4EAT with AWP.
Posts: 6,027
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
They will. BUT, not sure 15" will clear your brakes.
2002 was a transition year for a rotor change. 15 will clear the earlier style, but not the newer.
__________________
2003 Outback: "Kaylee". 124,000 and counting. Mods: GE Nighthawk low beams, HIR1 9011 high beam upgrade, Nokya 25k yellow fog lights, Fumoto valve, 04 Forester XT shift knob. Basics: G-Oil Bio-based Advanced Full Synthetic 5w30, Purolater oil filter, STP air filter, Valvoline Maxlife Dex/Merc ATF, Valvoline Durablend 80w90, Michelin Primacy MXV4. Also: More rust and parking lot scars than I care to think about. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Displaced to Chicago.
Car: 2003 2.5 4EAT with AWP.
Posts: 6,027
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
__________________
2003 Outback: "Kaylee". 124,000 and counting. Mods: GE Nighthawk low beams, HIR1 9011 high beam upgrade, Nokya 25k yellow fog lights, Fumoto valve, 04 Forester XT shift knob. Basics: G-Oil Bio-based Advanced Full Synthetic 5w30, Purolater oil filter, STP air filter, Valvoline Maxlife Dex/Merc ATF, Valvoline Durablend 80w90, Michelin Primacy MXV4. Also: More rust and parking lot scars than I care to think about. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Bronx NYC / Westchester
Car: DIY-Turbo 2.2l OBS 13.16s 1/4mile @ 104.70MPH
Posts: 328
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
I can ID the front brakes visually as follows: If you look @ the swept area of the front disks - the newer/bigger brake have more unswept area then the smaller/older disk set-up. If you have about .5-.7" of unswept area towards the center of the rotor you have the bigger brakes. If the pads sweep just about the entire rotor you have the smaller brakes. Note: Front Brake Calipers & Pads are the same for both the 10.9" & 11.4" front brake rotor set-ups (which is why there is more unswept area on the big brake set-up). Pics would help but I do no have any handy... |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|