![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 14
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
About to order my first Subaru! 2013 Outback 3.6 limited with the special appearance package. I'm trading in my 2010 Silverado. Ive always owned a truck but my need for one has dwindled over the years. If I ever do my dad and brother both have them so I'm covered. I thought about the 4 cylinder but I think downgrading from an 8 to a 4 would send me into shock so the 6 should do just fine.
My fiancé just got her first Subaru last year, a 2011 Forrester. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 35
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
I went from a Nissan Armada and had the very same concerns. I downsized and wanted to do so for fuel economy. I was set to go with the 2.5, again mainly for the mileage. Talking to a friend with the 6 i had to go drive them back to back. The 2.5 actually felt fine, but i actually felt more comfortable driving the 6 cyl. Have not regretted it one bit. I have been getting anywhere from 22-24 mpgs on avg. I dont drive it realy hard and thats mixed city/highway driving. Good luck! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: home of the Jayhawks
Car: 06 OBW 2.5i NA
Posts: 1,324
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
I also traded a Silverado for my OB. I went with the 2.5 and it gets me around just fine. I did put a hitch on the car so I can pull a small trailer if I need the extra capacity. I can honestly say that I haven't missed the truck much at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 11,496
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Just arrived in LA CaliforNIA from SF. No roof gear we were at 32mpg for 80% of the trip after a kid potty break stop and top off got jammed up in a bad traffic one lane vs two deal then the 4000ft climb over the vine into LA dropped us to 28mpg. Speeds were 70+mph other than the 15mile stop and go mess for a stretch which killed the mileage average
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: SoCal
Car: 2003 Outback, 5 MT, 134K, HG changed.
Posts: 183
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Welcome to So Cal Subiesailor. Apparently its a whole 'nother world down here, from what visitors tell me. Be sure to try an In-N-Out while you're here (if you still are)!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: SoCal
Car: 2003 Outback, 5 MT, 134K, HG changed.
Posts: 183
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
You know what's funny is I haven't been to one in about half a year, despite being about 2 miles from one. And yeah, it has to do with how crowded it always is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Parkersburg, WV
Car: '11 Outback 2.5i CVT - '06 Forester X 5MT
Posts: 1,234
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Welcome rellimie!
I too was torn between the 3.6 and 2.5. I sold my turbo Legacy GT to get my OB and was afraid of the downgrade in performance. But honestly once I truly thought about my needs for my OB, a family car for day to day driving and the occasional roadtrip, I soon realized the 2.5 is more than sufficient. After all the car can only handle so well and I've spent the last year towing with a 4cyl Hyundai, so I knew that wouldn't be an issue. My only other concern was how the CVT would feel, once I test drove it I found the smoothness to compliment the 2.5 quite well. You don't get that hard downshift when you stomp on it, and it doesn't whine at full rpm when you need to speed up a steep hill. The CVT keeps the revs rather constant, squeezing the most out of the 2.5. 1 year in and I don't regret going with the 2.5. I won't say I don't miss my LGT, but I just look in my rear view at the car seat in the back and I forget all about it
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|