![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 20
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
I have found a 2001 outback VDC with 125,000 miles I am going to look at to buy.
IS there anything I need to look at that might cause a concern with this model year? ![]() What are the differences between the LL.bean and VDC model besides the drivetrain. Any information will help.. Thank you Brian B |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New England
Car: 2008 Outback 3.0R L.L. Bean
Posts: 1,675
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
Of course, always look for a good maintenance history (or signs of it), since like any vehicle abuse will shorten its life. The L.L. Bean and VDC are very similar. The VDC has everything the LL Bean has, plus VDC (vehicle dynamics control--Subaru's traction control system), VTD (variable torque distribution...while the Bean and all other automatic Subarus of the time had a slight front wheel power bias under normal conditions, the VDC model (with VTD) has a slight rear wheel drive bias). The VDC also has the McIntosh stereo system. I believe everything else is the same. The VDC Outback was Subaru's top-of-the line vehicle and trim level in its day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New England
Car: 2008 Outback 3.0R L.L. Bean
Posts: 1,675
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
http://www.cars101.com/subaru/outback/2002-vdc.html |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|