![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 41
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
I was getting some service work done at the dealership this morning when I saw the XV Crosstrek for the first time. I didn't even know Subaru came out with a new car. What does everyone else think about this car? Looks like a compact Outback in a way.
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: yelm, wa
Car: '11 outback 2.5i premium '12 impreza sport limited
Posts: 2,012
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
|
already a few threads on this
__________________
who cares about resale value? this is an outback, not getting something else til at least 200k miles! tired of a sore elbow from the hard plastic armrest? get a cover here http://www.redlinegoods.com/cgi-bin/...r&id=1&aid=774 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Reno, NV (Ca transplant)
Posts: 1,723
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
The XV is a Subaru Impreza, might be more info on this forum.
2013 Subaru XV Crosstrek Reviewed - NASIOC
__________________
'12 Outback Limited 2.5i, Cypress Green Pearl, sunroof, illumination package #2, rear bumper guard, puddle lights, mudflaps, no nav '10 Nissan Frontier SE Crew Cab 4X2 long bed '98 BMW R1100RT-P '86 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS, restored, original, stock daily driver, '09 Harley Davidson FLHP |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: ID, MT, ND, I'm a transient
Car: 2004 Outback Wagon, Mystic Blue Pearl
Posts: 4,883
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Its just the next iteration of the Impreza based Outback Sport.
__________________
I'm not retarded, I just don't proofread my posts |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: EstesPark/BocaRaton
Car: 07OBXTL/08LGT.B
Posts: 577
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Yeah. I've been thinking this also. I guess the 2.0L is just something we'll all have to get used to the idea of -- but (maybe next year) what's needed is force-air and a better transmission. Why oh why isn't Subaru going the DSG route in stead of that super slushy CVT? HPH
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sandy, UT
Car: 2013 2.5i Limited, Special Appearance Package, Brilliant Brown Pearl, Saddle Brown Leather, HK Audio, Moonroof, Navigation
Posts: 102
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
I was going to test drive one last week when I was having my remote start installed (girlfriend is thinking of getting one) but they are flying off the lot faster then they can get them in SLC, UT. They arent discounting them at all.
__________________
2013 Outback 2.5i Limited, Special Appearence Package, Brilliant Brown Pearl, Saddle Brown Leather, Navigation, Puddle Lights, Moonroof, Back Up Camera, BlueTooth, Smart Remote Start, Arch Moldings, Moon roof/Hood deflectors,Dual Heated/Power Seats HK Audio, Curt Class III Trailer Hitch, All Weather Package 1995 Porsche C4 993, Black/Black, LWF, Rennsport Chip, Bilstein HD's, ROW/Sport suspension 1977 Ford Bronco Sport, Light Jade, 351w, 3" Lift |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 11,761
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
Not to mention a DSC AT still suffers the same issue a normal AT has - limited set of gears to choose from. CVT is no sports car AT but for a wagon on stilts it does a pretty good job. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: PA
Car: 2006 Outback XT Limited
Posts: 2,848
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Last time I visited the big dealer in Allentown PA they said they didn't even have a demo model- no trouble selling their entire allotment without one, so why bother? I like that, because it keeps their overhead a notch lower.
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|