![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Car: 2008 3.0R LL.Bean
Posts: 50
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Thanks for the feedback plain OMK and cardoc. It sounds like I should just get another alignment done with no load.
To clarify the above alignment measurements are with the car unloaded and a full tank of fuel. Are the measurements 'out of spec" enough to dramatically increase tire-wear? I have not noted any abnormal handling characteristics. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Nepean ON Canada
Car: 07 OBW 2.5i Touring (SE) D-4AT
Posts: 7,049
Feedback Score: 2 reviews
|
Quote:
Those alignment machine readings appear to be in degrees, rather than the mm used by Subaru in its specs. The spec is between 0 and -3mm. According to the alignment machine reports I have from my dealer, the rear toe should be between 0 and -0.13 degrees, which I imagine reflects the conversion from mm to degrees. (There's a complex calculation to translate alignment "mm" to "degrees" that depends on the wheel diameter.) If this is correct, then both rear toe measurements are out of spec. Even if the absolute converted value of 0.13 isn't correct, the rear toe should be 0 or negative, not positive, when the car is not additionally loaded. Incidentally, I'm surprised, and disappointed, that the shop didn't provide you with a printed report of the alignment readings, both times. |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|