![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
|
|
#31 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: WA
Car: '12 Outback 2.5L CVT Premium, Skyblue
Posts: 1,010
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
6" curb, backed up with car @ 90* till it stopped and took my foot off the gas, waited a moment, gave some gas and backed over it no issue. Didn't push any buttons, just drove up and did the test. I really think this sorta thing is a reflection of something wrong with that car, not a design flaw. |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#32 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Car: 2010 Outback 2.5i CVT Prem
Posts: 8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
One might instead call this a "design limitation", but if that limitation causes abnormal behavior as is the consensus on this thread, then is it a "design flaw"? If Subaru engineers have to limit the engine-power applied to the CVT because it cannot handle the stresses of normal back-road start/stop situations, is it a design flaw? Rhetorical questions. Since my last post: (1) I called SOA customer support and opened a case # for my problem. (2) I made a service appointment with the local dealer. The Subaru mechanic found no problem, but I don't know how he tested it, so I took the service manager for a ride and quickly showed him the issue in a nearby parking lot and had him to document his observations on the service report. (3) I emailed SOA and attached the report. Subsequently they spoke with the service manager. (4) An excerpt of a subsequent SOA email reply to me reads: "... there is not a fix for this issue. Your vehicle is working as designed." I'm uncertain how to proceed. Useful/insightful advice is welcome. A car marketed as an "Outback" with almost 9" of ground clearance shouldn't "give up" so easily when encountering relatively minor back-road situations. If I wanted a street car I'da bought a Legacy or similar. Last edited by photodude; 11-21-2012 at 12:27 PM. Reason: Improved the formatting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Fl33tw00d, PA
Car: 2003 Baja Yellow 5MT 217k miles & 2009 Outback 2.5i Quartz Silver 5MT 77k miles
Posts: 28
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
The vehicle is operating as designed. CVT is not designed for this. It just doesnt have the guts. Ground clearance doesnt make up for the CVT. Its still a street car, not a truck.
Next time, get a manual transmission or a traditional Automatic. I made sure I got a manual trans so I have control, not some computer or a weak CVT gearbox. Sorry, I don't think there is anything more you can do about it. I have 6 years at Subaru of America under my belt. |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 11,493
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
I have two early 2010's with the CVT one tows trailers has had to back the boat back up a rutted dirt road "wrong turn with no where to go" no issues with it. Lots of trips to Sierras where we measure snow in FEET not inches. No issues as long as the traction control is turned off - putting it in Manual mode 1st gear has enabled us to blast through some pretty nasty stuff.
Lived with a MT 5spd Subaru for 180,000 miles - great car but no where near the climbing ability the CVT has due to the lack of gearing and the CVT is far better at keeping the rear end behind the front end with a novice driving vs the old MT would step out almost every time a slick down hill section was driven. |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 (permalink) | |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Displaced to Chicago.
Car: 2003 2.5 4EAT with AWP.
Posts: 6,023
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
__________________
2003 Outback: "Kaylee". 125,000 and counting. Mods: GE Nighthawk low beams, HIR1 9011 high beam upgrade, Nokya 25k yellow fog lights, Fumoto valve, 04 Forester XT shift knob. Basics: G-Oil Bio-based Advanced Full Synthetic 5w30, Purolater oil filter, STP air filter, Valvoline Maxlife Dex/Merc ATF, Valvoline Durablend 80w90, Michelin Primacy MXV4. Also: More rust and parking lot scars than I care to think about. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Car: 2010 Outback 2.5i CVT Prem
Posts: 8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
Reverse power problem - YouTube The Subaru Outback is not marketed as a street car, see the attached screen shot from their website. Crossover. As a consumer I demand drive-train performance to be on-par with previous AT designs, and I demand a car that won't leave me stranded in the "Outback". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 (permalink) | |||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2011
Car: 2002 Outback Wagon 2.5L Auto Weather Package
Posts: 1,062
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I'm seeing a consistent pattern here of not wanting to think, and expecting miracles from the vehicle. My brother tried to tell me our old 4 wheeler could climb a vertical embankment - until it fell on him and almost broke his arm.
__________________
My car warms the rear window, mirrors, wipers, my butt, and my heart - because I WILL get there! |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#38 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Pacific NW
Car: 13 Outback 2.5 Premium CVT
Posts: 159
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
I don't think it is due to being high centered, any vehicle I have high centered the wheels spun freely and could not get enough traction to push it off the whatever it was hung up on, in the video you can only hear the engine rev but doesn't sound like any wheels are spinning
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: behind the Krell Metal door
Car: 03 H6 OBW & 06 WRX Sportwagon
Posts: 4,275
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
granted, they don't test them high-centered, but, they do well enough in this video;
__________________
Time Flies Like an Arrow, Fruit Flies Like a Banana! |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|