Subaru Outback Forums banner
21 - 40 of 552 Posts
Yes, of course, the RalliTek springs are stiffer, but they still compress!
Well obviously, but I would have thought that it would have been minimal with the RalliTek springs and what I'd consider a 'light' load (200 lbs).

So, adding 200lbs should compress the rear suspension at least 1/4".
Okay, if that's accurate, that's about what I'd expect, however...

It's not a HUGE difference (the change in ride height is not even noticeable), but it does seem to have been enough to change the rear toe a bit. Unloaded the rear toe was -0.05° left and 0.00° right, and loaded it was +0.11° and +0.17°.

I'm not sure how big a problem 0.16-0.17° change is, but note that Subaru's alignment spec tolerance is only ± 0.065°, and adding only 200lbs ballast changed the alignment more than double that.
I was really hoping that 1/4" of suspension sag wouldn't be translating to a change in toe of more than double alignment window, that seems pretty extreme, and just continues to support the design issues Subaru has saddled owners with..
 
FWIW, I did the rear alignment to zero toe with 200lbs of water in the back, and since then I have had multiple trips back and forth to the mountains loaded with gear on roads so slick you could barely walk on them. And this is with the stock all-season tires.

No issues with GW, and from what I've read those are the absolutely ideal conditions for it to occur. Not that I had any GW before, but just wanted to submit a data point.
 
I was really hoping that 1/4" of suspension sag wouldn't be translating to a change in toe of more than double alignment window, that seems pretty extreme, and just continues to support the design issues Subaru has saddled owners with..
Well, keep in mind that we're only talking 1/10ths of degrees here... Putting a fat person in one of the seats probably changes things a 1/10th or two, and just filling up the gas tank is probably worth several 1/100ths.

Of course, it would be nice if the toe would stay constant as the suspension compresses, but Subaru probably thought that there were handling advantages to be had by letting it change (this looks like passive 4-wheel-steering geometry to me), or maybe they just botched the Outback's suspension geometry when they converted it from the Legacy (probably).


I think for most of us rear toe is a quesion of compromise.

IMHO, it's a mistake to align the car when totally empty, because it's never going to be driven empty (the driver weighs something).

If you align it lightly loaded, then you'll wind up with some negative toe when it's empty and some positive toe when it's heavily loaded. This is probably ideal.

If you do a lot of hauling or you're really worried about ghost-walking, then maybe you want to align it with 400lbs. or more in the rear, understanding that you'll have significant negative toe when the car is unloaded.

Good luck!

Bimmer
 
asd wrote:
FWIW, I did the rear alignment to zero toe with 200lbs of water in the back, and since then I have had multiple trips back and forth to the mountains loaded with gear on roads so slick you could barely walk on them. And this is with the stock all-season tires.

No issues with GW, and from what I've read those are the absolutely ideal conditions for it to occur. Not that I had any GW before, but just wanted to submit a data point.
Potentially a valuable data point, asd. Those conditions indeed are ideal ghostwalking conditions. Is your vehicle a 2005 - 2009 Outback?

If it is, and you've not had any ghostwalking issues (under the same conditions, I assume) before, it raises the question as to why some '05 - '09s have the problem and some do not. Or is my assumption incorrect?

Thanks Bimmer for clarifying whether your discussion was aimed at the ghostwalking problem or a personal handling preference.

Cheers.
 
Another non-ghostwalker here. Closest I've had to that effect was when new from the dealer, with lots of understeer, and yet with the feeling it was going to swap ends when pushed in corners, in the dry, unladen.
Turns out the dealer had higher pressures in the rear. Fixed that, and went after the understeer, first with LGT rear bar (noticeable improvement), then with JDM 20mm hollow. Also maxed front camber & set toe at 0.05 deg in al around, no load. And added GY TT tires. Understeer down to acceptable levels.

Directional stability is still not that great, at highway speed. Looking at adding front caster, but rear still needs work. At 80 000, shocks need replacement.
 
My experience was in the rain with 500lbs of crap in the back. This was on the old stock rear shocks. It started pouring and next thing I know in a straight line the back starts getting twitchy going back and forth like it wants to swing out. It was made much worse by gusty wind. I stopped at a gas station and could see a huge difference in toe front to back. I could also see where the tires were getting worn a bit from the excessive toe. ie scarring from the road at a slightly different angle from the tire tread. An alignment with weight and the KYBs in back seem to have fixed it. I had similar conditions a week ago and no twitchiness in back.

In 3 weeks I'll be testing it out in some interesting conditions with a 3k lbs trailer being towed...
 
Another option that I know won't work for everyone is to purchase a Legacy. I owned a 2005 Outback Sedan that was a GW canadidate (I made it better with tires, alignment and upgrade rear swaybar, but I never trusted the car). I sold the car last spring and purchased a 2009 Subaru Legacy SE. Now this is what driving a Subaru in the winter is all about!!! This weekend beens the perfect weekend for black ice, snow and blowing snow, along with below zero temps. Was out yesterday and today, with no issues at all. Going down the highway when everyone was going 45, I had no issue passing and get around other cars (don't like driving in a pack when its slippery out). This car is stable and can be driven with confidence. In my 2005 Outback it would have been two hands on the wheel and watch everyone pass me. I never would let my Wife or Daughters drive the 2005 Outback when conditions were like they are this weekend. With the Legacy I have no concerns at all in how the car handles.. I know its not a wagon or an Outback but for me it made sense having a car that was secure and stable in the Western MI winters.
 
bsevic wrote:
Another option that I know won't work for everyone is to purchase a Legacy.
That's correct. The regular Legacy platform is not the one which Subaru compromised in 2005 - 2009. Although I did not know that the Legacy Outback was still offered in a sedan in 2005. Had you even replaced your '05 Outback sedan with a regular '05 Legacy sedan or wagon, you likely would have been as happy as you are now with your '09 Legacy sedan. For those though who shelled-out $35,000 for a new '05 Outback, the hit in depreciation is huge, and the angst understandably very disconcerting. There is a vast difference between what such buyers expected from Subaru and what they actually got. There's nothing worse than driving with passengers or cargo on ice in what feels like a float plane with no controls. Glad to hear your driving experience is now feeling safe and as it should be.

What can be confusing is that Subaru also put the "Outback" nameplate on the Impreza for a period of time. The ghostwalking problem though occurs on the 2005 - 2009 Legacy Outback which have the raised suspension compared to the regular 2005 - 2009 Legacy which does not.

Cheers.
 
Yea...which leads to another option. It's more expensive than the others but will give better results IMO.

Swap to legacy KYB struts and get springs and top hats. It is more expensive because you will need to replace all 4 struts/springs/top hats. You will lose the ride height, but it will definitely get rid of the ghostwalking issues and give you a much better handling car. Obviously it is not for everyone, but is definitely another option. It is especially a good option if your current suspension is worn as it will cost no more than completely overhauling your current suspension.
 
Discussion starter · #30 ·
Yea...which leads to another option. It's more expensive than the others but will give better results IMO.

Swap to legacy KYB struts and get springs and top hats. It is more expensive because you will need to replace all 4 struts/springs/top hats. You will lose the ride height, but it will definitely get rid of the ghostwalking issues and give you a much better handling car. Obviously it is not for everyone, but is definitely another option. It is especially a good option if your current suspension is worn as it will cost no more than completely overhauling your current suspension.
Megan Racing also makes Coilover suspension for the Outback which lowers closer to LGT spec. Though I've read mixed reviews about that brand.

I wonder if the 2000-2004 Outbacks and Baja trucks with jacked up aftermarket suspensions would have the GW issue too? The multi-link system looks very similar across all these model years, so if its just because the 2005 Outback is jacked up from the factory, you'd figure that all these folks modifying their cars would have similar issues.
 
Only if they are jacking them up and ignoring the change in geometry. If they are not compensating for it, then they are probably getting some weird effects as well.
 
Discussion starter · #32 ·
Only if they are jacking them up and ignoring the change in geometry. If they are not compensating for it, then they are probably getting some weird effects as well.
Hmm that got me thinking. Is this another potential candidate to fix the GW issue?

http://legacygt.com/forums/showthre.../showthread.php/whiteline-kta124-adjustable-camber-toe-link-install-141403.html

In theory, you could alter the length of the upper-middle and rear-toe lateral links to totally change the dynamics of the suspension geometry. I think these are mainly designed for lowered cars where you cannot achieve proper camber and toe settings because the OEM adjuster is already maxed out. So I'm not sure it would help the Outback situation much. But you do get those fancy bright yellow polyurethane bushings.
 
Yes! This needs to be reported!

Having just suffered (2/21/11) through major and terrifying "ghost walking" during a lovely Minnesota winter drive with my family through icy conditions, and having jumped on this forum and learned about the longstanding nature of this particular problem, I have already reported the incident to the NHTSA website. It all can be done online. If you have experienced this, report it. You may save a life. This is as bad as the Toyota accelleration issue, in my opinion.

Office of Defects Investigation (ODI)
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT)
 
I have already submitted my complaint about the ghostwalking to NHTSA using the online complaint process. At this point in time, there is only one other complaint about this problem registered. For crying out loud, this is a serious deal and from the look of things Subaru is not taking it seriously. If you have experienced this problem, report it. Today.
 
Minndvr wrote: I have already submitted my complaint about the ghostwalking to NHTSA using the online complaint process. At this point in time, there is only one other complaint about this problem registered.
I registered a complaint with NHTSA last year and without going back to the previous thread and doing any kind of count, I would say there should be MUCH more than one other complaint registered. I couldn't agree more -- the problem is extremely serious.
 
I have already submitted my complaint about the ghostwalking to NHTSA using the online complaint process. At this point in time, there is only one other complaint about this problem registered. For crying out loud, this is a serious deal and from the look of things Subaru is not taking it seriously. If you have experienced this problem, report it. Today.
I haven't experienced ghostwalking in our 07 Outback, even on the crappy RE92s.

Unfortunately, the chances of the NHTSA doing anything about this problem very very low. The reason being the potential issue isn't happening during normal driving conditions, car load also appears to be a potential factor, as well as speed. The NHSTA is going to look at these compliants of "I was driving 45mph in icy conditions with 500lbs in the back and the car started oversteering uncontrollably." Chances are high that their reaction will be:

1) They're driving way too fast for conditions
2) They're hitting black ice
3) The drivers should be aware that loading up a car with weight results in different handling dynamics
4) Worn tires could be a factor

Now if this problem was happening in the rain, then I'd bet they'd be far more responsive. Secondly, this potential issue isn't easily repeatable. Numerous people have reported the problem popping up randomly. The issue has to be somewhat repeatable for the agency to say it's a real problem. Regardless, if your car does exhibit ghostwalking, then why not report it?
 
  • Helpful
Reactions: dub537h
Bronson wrote:
I haven't experienced ghostwalking in our 07 Outback, even on the crappy RE92s.
You only recently bought your used '07 Outback.

Bronson wrote:
Unfortunately, the chances of the NHTSA doing anything about this problem very very low.
That is your opinion.

Bronson wrote:
The reason being the potential issue isn't happening during normal driving conditions,
Since when are car design issues only a problem of normal driving conditions? Vehicles are required to be safe in a wide variety of driving condition.

Bronson wrote:
car load also appears to be a potential factor,
Car load is a factor. Add two passengers and suddenly one of the preconditions are met.

Bronson wrote:
as well as speed
Yes, the driver of a ghostwalking '05 - '09 Outback is driving half the speed of other vehicles on the road and the vehicle is totally unsafe.

Bronson wrote:
Chances are high that their reaction will be:
This is entirely speculation on your part. The NHTSA has a responsibility for dealing with vehicle safety. It acts on the basis of complaints received.

Bronson wrote:
2) They're hitting black ice
They're on the same ice as everyone else but with absolutely no road feel.

Bronson wrote:
3) The drivers should be aware that loading up a car with weight results in different handling dynamics
Carrying so much as two passengers is not exactly loading up a car with weight. It is a common occurrence.

Bronson wrote:
4) Worn tires could be a factor
If you read the lead post you will see that tires are not an issue and the thread is not to be wasted on talking about tires.

Bronson wrote:
Secondly, this potential issue isn't easily repeatable.
Carrying two passengers (or the equivalent) on ice is very repeatable.

Bronson wrote:
Numerous people have reported the problem popping up randomly.
Not all ghostwalking Outback drivers drive with the equivalent of two passengers and do so regularly on ice. If they did the problem would not be random at all. The last poll showed nearly 50% of '05 - '09 Outback drivers experienced ghostwalking.

Let's see, that's a swing and a miss. And another swing and a miss. Looks like about one swing and a miss short of four strike-outs.
 
I like facts: here they are

The 2009 Outback in question had a "normal" load for a wagon: 2 thin adults, 2 thin teens, light luggage (sleeping bags, overnight bags). A 4-passenger car needs to work for both 1 and 4 passengers. I took the car to the dealer. Nothing wrong with the suspension; nothing wrong with the tires (although the maintenance manager did comment that the standard issue tires were not good for winter driving (!)). Apparently this type of problem is not unheard of in other vehicles . . . designing for the weight of 4 means it drives poorly for 1 and vice versa. But driving poorly on ice and "ghost walking" are two different things. I've been driving for a long time. My first car was a 65 Dodge Dart (no kidding. . .Tom and Ray would approve) and I have driven Fords, and VWs, and miscellanious fleet vehicles. Some handle better than others. But as a noted above, ghost walking is not the same as bad handling. Bad handling can be addressed with good driving. Ghost walking happens regardless of what you are doing. Trust me: I was driving the car in a controlled manner. Something has gone very wrong with the last few years of Outbacks. Other Subaru AWD vehicles do not have this problem. I tend to hold with the commenter who mentioned the hight adjustment to the rear.

My dealer is going to "start a case" on this situation and is taking it seriously. Dealer also comments, however, that Subaru takes calls from its customers seriously, maybe even more seriously than calls from its dealer/maintenance people. So, please call 1-800-782-2783 if you have had this problem. Thanks for listening.
 
Hmm... A 2009 that has Ghostwalking issues... I just had my first real GW issue this winter in my 2008. I attributed it to my worn out RE92s. They were into the wear indicators. So, I got an alignment done when I put the new tires on (Yokohama Avid Envigor). The rear alignment was way out. They set it within the specs for the 2008, and I haven't had a problem since. Of course, I haven't driven on a snow or ice covered highways since I got the work done.
 
21 - 40 of 552 Posts