Subaru Outback Forums banner
1 - 2 of 24 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
166 Posts
Depends on the time frame you have in mind when you say "-on the way out." Long term, almost certainly. The handwriting is on the wall, an it's written in the laws of physics. Smaller displacement engines are winning the battle, because every cubic inch of that displacement has to be filled with fuel-air mixture, once all the lean burn and valving tricks are applied. After four decades of refinement in passenger cars (beginning in the 1970's in SAABs), the turbocharger has been proven a workable expedient to provide power on tap in small displacement four-cylinder engines that will provide equivalent performance to a six, but that power is only being paid for when passing or another demand situation, while the larger engine must burn more fuel by design.
So- the answer to the question is that current designs like the Subaru 2.5i and 3.6r probably aren't going anywhere until the end of the manufacturer's intended life cycle....but, yes, they are going, and will likely be replaced by a generation of smaller turbocharged engines.
To see the future in the U.S., I suggest you subscribe to Green Car Congress, a newsletter that covers automotive change worldwide. What's going on in Japan and Europe will almost inevitably come here as the cost of fuel relentlessly ratchets up side by side with the emissions regulations.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
166 Posts
I don't see the turbo or the 2.0 coming anytime soon to the Outback.

Regarding the turbo:
1. They already had it. And dropped it.
2. Most people that buy Outbacks aren't looking for "sporty" so the turbo name has zero cachet.
3. 93 octane gas requirements suck. The turbo motors need premium... or they knock. 91 works (most of the time) but 87 ain't gonna happen.
Premium in the new (2014) Forester 2.0T is only recommended, not required.

Any current production turbo vehicle from any manufacturer can easily be made to run any grade of fuel*. All engines have knock sensors, and these will change the engine parameters so that they'll run 87 RON fuel fine, even if the manufacturer recommends premium, albeit at some lower performance level. In our car (see sig), we've never run anything but 89 RON midgrade (have drive it 115K so far, 137K total, everything is running fine), although the manual recommends 93 RON gas. Neither of us can tell the difference in performance.

*It is true that not all vehicle are set up to do this; some manufacturers set up engines to perform so that running grades of fuel other than premium is a no-no, but these will state "premium required."
 
1 - 2 of 24 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top