Anyone who gambles in casinos with the expectation of winning may as well buy extended warranties, because both institutions price their product in favor of the house. Casinos are for those for whom the reward is the adrenaline, and extended warranties are for people too poor to buy a new tranny at 80k (or a new car in the first place). Everyone else should avoid both gambles.
Opinions include a whole spectrum of subjectivity, and the most successful humans learn to navigate those grey spaces. It’s ok to feel as you do about your choices, but is there a need to judge those who who do not hold those?
Of course warranties are insurance products that pay off in the favor of the “house” and costs will always be adjusted by the issuer to ensure it. That’s basic risk analysis.
Many people can sure “afford” the car and are not “poor” and will choose a warranty. These are not stupid people. Sure, they can put put aside $20k just for repairs in a low interest account for the life of the car and “self-insure.” Is it arguably a bad financial decision to buy a warranty, perhaps. But some people would prefer to keep that cash reserve liquid, invest it, or just not worry about any of this at all and just have the peace of mind that the car will be taken care of fully should something happen.
It also doesn’t mean you are poor or cannot afford a car if you don’t have $20k in the bank to fully replace major vehicle systems unexpectedly, and instead would rather front load a warranty…
It’s a factory backed warranty that even includes tows, rentals, and trip interruption (save ya $100 a year on your car insurance add ons maybe even).
There are pros and cons. They don’t have to be absolutes packaged with judgement.