Can you mix the the Subaru CVT HIGH TORQUE fluid with the Amsoil TR690/VTF22 CVT fluid, because according to Amsoil, it is compatible with the Subaru CVT HIGH TORQUE fluid.
If a name brand fluid stated compatibility specifically with one and only one Subaru CVT fluid, then it presumably matches the physical and chemical characteristics of that specific OEM fluid and it should work correctly.I think many owners would consider using a higher quality full synthetic CVT fluid and gear oil if it works correctly in these transaxles.
Oh, that is just WRONG....I have a cautionary video that shows what happens when you mix a lot.
If dealer finds other fluid in tranny you can forget about extended 100K warranty. Beside original good for 100K. If it aint broke don't fix it.@cardoc , have you seen any specific CVT fluid mixes cause problems in the tr690 or tr580? There are more than 1 report of owners using an aftermarket approved CVT fluid without any issue, and unless installed when the unit was built would be considered mixing. I haven't looked in a while but I recall several good reports from owners using Valvoline fluid in their tr-580's,
I wouldn't, warranty aspects alone.Can you mix the the Subaru CVT HIGH TORQUE fluid with the Amsoil TR690/VTF22 CVT fluid, because according to Amsoil, it is compatible with the Subaru CVT HIGH TORQUE fluid.
Thanks for educating us on the different versions of CVT tranny's. Seems clean fluid is more critical with CVTs than ATs.🇺🇸If a name brand fluid stated compatibility specifically with one and only one Subaru CVT fluid, then it presumably matches the physical and chemical characteristics of that specific OEM fluid and it should work correctly.
Amsoil/Redline/Motul/Valvoline says they have a fluid compatible with High Torque CVT-LV fluid and no other CVT fluid? Fantastic.
There are fundamental mechanical differences between a push-belt CVT and a pull-chain CVT. Push-belt CVT pulleys have a set clamping force, but a pull-chain CVT varies pulley clamping force dynamically based on expected torque. Chain slip is catastrophic so it's critical that in a pull-chain CVT the frictional characteristics of the fluid are EXACT so that the variable clamping force of the pulleys neither creates excessive friction and wear, nor insufficient friction and chain slip.
A push-belt is composed of hundreds of tiny metal plates held together by steel bands. It's called a push belt because under compressive pressure the tiny metal plates stack and interlock to form a stiff rod that pushes. The belt is not under tension. It uses compressive strength instead of tensile strength.
View attachment 505347
In contrast, a pull-chain CVT only operates under tension. Pull-chain CVT's include Audi Multitronic (discontinued) Subaru Lineartronic, and more recently Hyundai/Kia IVT.
So you have hundreds of literal chain links being pulled instead of pushed, and it's all about tensile strength not compressive strength. A chain is only as strong as its weakest link. Pull-chain CVT fluid must ensure that chain link pin wear is kept to a minimum yet the edges of the chain must have enough friction with the pulley surface not to slip. Again the frictional characteristics are critical. I don't have documentation but I'm sure that the metallurgical properties of a push belt and a pull chain are different and this may come in to play for fluid chemistry. The bottom line is that a universal fluid is the wrong fluid for a pull-chain CVT. The vast majority of CVT transmissions in the world are push-belt, and if anything, a universal push-belt and pull-chain CVT fluid is probably optimized for the most common application - the push-belt not the pull chain.
You also can't swap the CVT fluids for one pull-chain CVT with another pull-chain CVT fluid. Again they are different for a reason. The passages might be a different diameter, the manner in which the pulley clamping force is measured might be different. The Transmission Control Unit is almost certainly programmed differently as well.
So the fluid in a CVT is much more than "just a hydraulic fluid/lubricant" it's a highly specific engineered fluid that is integral to the mechanical operation of the CVT.
Thank you for sharing the msds sheet. Any idea what is the viscosity at 40C of the SOA748V0200 ?Wonder why eneos doesn’t make the high torque version available? The MSDS indicates the JX Nippon Oil company makes it for Subaru... same for the LV version too.
I've never seen a datasheet for the original HT-CVT fluid (V0200), but all the UOAs I've seen show a 100C viscosity of around 6.5 cSt. There's even an analysis of virgin fluid posted here:Thank you for sharing the msds sheet. Any idea what is the viscosity at 40C of the SOA748V0200 ?
BR
Joe.
Wonder why eneos doesn’t make the high torque version available? The MSDS indicates the JX Nippon Oil company makes it for Subaru... same for the LV version too.
Dear Walker,I've never seen a datasheet for the original HT-CVT fluid (V0200), but all the UOAs I've seen show a 100C viscosity of around 6.5 cSt. There's even an analysis of virgin fluid posted here:
![]()
('14-'18) - CVT fluid for 2015-2016 automatic...
Last year when I mistakenly drained my 2.5i's transmission fluid(CVT) thinking it was the crankcase oil or engine oil, I was informed by the dealer that I must use Subaru fluid CVT C-30 oil,which is blue in color to refill it. The question ,is this the correct fluid to use on my 2016 Forester...www.subaruforester.org
Motul does offer a high-torque fluid which they claim is compatible with the Subaru fluid and their datasheet shows a slightly higher viscosity but should give you some idea (the 40C value for V0200 will depend on the viscosity index, so if it's lower than Motul, then that value would go up):
MOTUL MULTI CVTF - Motul
MOTUL MULTI CVTF High performance Technosynthese® fluid specially engineered for Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) gearbox type.www.motul.com
Wonder why eneos doesn’t make the high torque version available? The MSDS indicates the JX Nippon Oil company makes it for Subaru... same for the LV version too.
@SilverOnyx@joe.shamoun which transmission do you have, TR580 or TR690 and what year is your car?
Curious which non OEM fluid you used that led to slippage?
You can share pics right here in the forum, no need for e-mail. [Control-P]
This all is especially important because LuK designed the chain to be self lubricating (and make its unique special sounds, especially in the case of the TR690), by the fluid being squeezed through the link plate gaps. Shaeffler (LuK's parent) has a ton of neat training on these matters, including some information on how clamping pressure is determined. Some of that training is public, if you dig through Google.I get a lot of Subarus through here. Quite a few had a fluid change of some sort and a red fluid was in the transmission; universal. The way I knew to check was the temperature and pressure fluctuations. I always change the fluid out as much as possible prior to replacing a valve body to see what change is affected. Some times a fluid change works. Other times, it comes to a VB replacement. 3 TR580 CVTs had to be changed out due to chain/pulley damage. Whether the fluid mix did it, or whether damage was done and a fluid replacement was done to see if there would be improvement is up in the air. I don't always know the background on the cars. My experience with CVTs is when there's a problem it comes down to the fluid, VB or torque converter due to running bad fluid and continued driving with a bad valve body. Those 3 TR580 CVTs are the only 3 CVTs I've ever changed out and they all had red fluid in them. That "universal" crap is no more trustworthy for a CVT than the "universal" HP fluid is for the 4EAT or 5EAT transmissions. It just doesn't perform well. And I still believe that the issues with CVTs can be narrowed down to fluid break down. It is impossible for any fluid to last forever and perform like it should.
I don't risk it. The properties of the fluid are different. The temperature and pressure differences are apparent in data. The transition through the "gear" ratios and torque converter apply are different from one new universal fluid to the proper new fluid. The cost variance between getting the fluid Subaru says to use in the car and getting the fluid that's cheaper is like using low octane fuel in a boosted boxer. You take your chances. Is it worth risking a $5000+ engine over $0.40/gallon at the pump? Is it worth the extra maintenance cost just in keeping the engine running clean? With the CVT replacement cost still high in the thousands, what's a couple bucks a quart for certainty? And I have not seen any data from these companies that show they tested their universal fluid in any Subaru CVT. I think they assume too much and their testing on Nissan, the one with the highest number of CVT fails, has them thinking that its good for all of them.
Subaru put a lot of time in designing these units so their units would last. They are the only company that has made constant changes to the design and operation of the CVT over short periods of time to keep the system economical and functioning. Something comes up after production, they go to work on it. When CVTs were being changed out at the dealer and the old units shipped back for autopsy, they found the mechanical parts to be in spec and the problem was the valve body. So they fixed it. The chain drive on these CVTs is loads better than Nissan, Ford and Dodge. Toyota's CVT is fairly reliable. Chain failures on Subaru CVTs is rare. And if you want to keep it that way, you use what Subaru says to use.
Don't get me wrong. I don't make any money from Subaru by telling readers that they should use specific parts and fluids. I use Royal Purple in engines because I know it's a valuable asset to reduce wear and the engines don't use any oil on it. I tell people to save some cash by getting a battery cable from the local part store rather than pay Subaru $150 for a set. I use aftermarket parts where its suitable and OEM where its needed. The CVT and other transmissions is where it is needed.
Thank you for your time with your kind reply. Very important to mention, that the slippage was observed when drove tested it at CVTF temp around the 50C when pushed it @ around 80% load not fully. Observed as well that when temp is >75C, No slippage observed when pushed it load @ around 80%. I did not test @ full load with higher temps, as won't be taking any chances on that. As we can see in the comparison table, with the available published data, the High viscosity of the Subi HT at low temp is really unique versus the other CVTFs and looks like its purposes to help with the performance and to enjoy the car without incurring any damage to the Pulleys and inherently to the VB. At the look of the old replaced strainer, and CVTF oil drain at 46Kmiles, CVTF and STRAINER must be replaced depending on users driving style to protect the VB and have some of that new fresh boron healing medicine to the moving parts. The one thing that am not so sure about, and specifically for the TR690, if it is just ok to drain the possible 9 liters out of the total 12.5 liters CVT fluid or to consider flushing the whole system, and if the latter procedure is safe. A month ago when the Subi dealership tech drained my CVTF and replaced the strainer, he was only able to replace 9 Liters out of total of 12.5 Liters. As we know, some of the old CVT fluid were still in the torque converter and the warmer. Let me know what you think about the following plan: 1-Somehow try to source out the unavailable Subi CVTF High Torque stuff to the oil city of Riyadh - the High Torque 20 liters drum. 2- Drive the vehicle for 30 minutes. 3- Let it rest for 1 hour. 4- Unplug the CVTF drain and collect and measure the drained CVTF. 5- Refill with exact amount with new Subi HT. 6- Detach the Warmer CVTF return line to CVT Box and connect line to a 2 liters container; 7- Run the vehicle on idle and see if on Park or on D, to flush a 1.5 to 2 liters through warmer return Line; 8-Shutdown engine; 9- Refill new CVTF with same flushed amount; and so on... Am suspecting that a flushing volume not exceeding the 20% total CVTF capacity will not hurt, especially that vehicle and CVT pulleys on idle mode ?!There's so much that goes into a fluid that looking at cSt is an important but just one aspect of its characteristics. I looked at your PDF and the aftermarket fluids aren't thinner when hot than the genuine Subaru fluid, and aren't thicker when cold, so based on that, their physical properties seem ok, but on the other hand, since Subaru's CVT varies hydraulic pressure on the pulley sheaves, any viscosity different than expected could have an effect. I'm sure the transmission has built in temperature compensation and if the viscosity curve isn't the same then it's possible that the clamping pressures are off one way or another. But different fluids may react to clamping pressure differently as well so to me it's an open question whether or not these aftermarket fluids are truly compatible. But you experienced slippage, and that's the bottom line.
Noticed that Motul Multi and High Torque have almost identical physical specifications yet they are two different formulas (presumably aside from dye) because the flash point is different. Curious what Motul would say.
View attachment 544193
Interestingly, during my research to source out the Subi High Torque CVTF, found 2 part numbers,which seems to be identical, Orange color stuff, but where the price of the drums differs by double. One at 220$ and other around 440$. And we are talking about part No. K0421Y0700 and part No.SOA748V0200 as listed online by Auto parts supplier Auto Spare Parts Online Store, Dubai, UAE - SSG.ASIAThank you for your time with your kind reply. Very important to mention, that the slippage was observed when drove tested it at CVTF temp around the 50C when pushed it @ around 80% load not fully. Observed as well that when temp is >75C, No slippage observed when pushed it load @ around 80%. I did not test @ full load with higher temps, as won't be taking any chances on that. As we can see in the comparison table, with the available published data, the High viscosity of the Subi HT at low temp is really unique versus the other CVTFs and looks like its purposes to help with the performance and to enjoy the car without incurring any damage to the Pulleys and inherently to the VB. At the look of the old replaced strainer, and CVTF oil drain at 46Kmiles, CVTF and STRAINER must be replaced depending on users driving style to protect the VB and have some of that new fresh boron healing medicine to the moving parts. The one thing that am not so sure about, and specifically for the TR690, if it is just ok to drain the possible 9 liters out of the total 12.5 liters CVT fluid or to consider flushing the whole system, and if the latter procedure is safe. A month ago when the Subi dealership tech drained my CVTF and replaced the strainer, he was only able to replace 9 Liters out of total of 12.5 Liters. As we know, some of the old CVT fluid were still in the torque converter and the warmer. Let me know what you think about the following plan: 1-Somehow try to source out the unavailable Subi CVTF High Torque stuff to the oil city of Riyadh - the High Torque 20 liters drum. 2- Drive the vehicle for 30 minutes. 3- Let it rest for 1 hour. 4- Unplug the CVTF drain and collect and measure the drained CVTF. 5- Refill with exact amount with new Subi HT. 6- Detach the Warmer CVTF return line to CVT Box and connect line to a 2 liters container; 7- Run the vehicle on idle and see if on Park or on D, to flush a 1.5 to 2 liters through warmer return Line; 8-Shutdown engine; 9- Refill new CVTF with same flushed amount; and so on... Am suspecting that a flushing volume not exceeding the 20% total CVTF capacity will not hurt, especially that vehicle and CVT pulleys on idle mode ?!